Truth In News
BENGHAZI-GATE
When did Barack Obama know about the terrorist attack on the U.S. Ambassador
Steven's Benghazi embassy headquarters? When did Hilary Clinton know about the
terrorist attack on the diplomatic headquarters in Benghazi? Information is
coming out via email transmissions from the U.S. State Department stating that
the U.S. Embassy was under attack in a coordinated attack with mortar
fire and RPGs.
In June 1972 there was politically motivated breakin at the Watergate building in
Washington DC. Nobody died during the breakin and nobody was hurt. Then President
Nixon began to cover-up the breakin and refused to name co-conspiritors and would
not release the audio tapes that would later incriminate him.
Watergate had no casulties while Benghazi had four dead Americans at the embassy.
There were two weeks when the White House surrogates told the American people that the
attack was because of an anti-islam video. In reality, the State Dept. and White
House both saw the attack in realtime as a U.S. drone was taking live video of the
attack.
It was U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice that went on 5 TV news shows saying that the attack
was because of a video, when she knew that the terrorists conducted coordinated mortar
and RPG fire. It was not a spontaneous attack by a flash mob. The attack was well-planned
and a U.S. drone recorded the entire fire fight and destruction of the embassy. It was
Hilary Clinton that made the same statements to the American people and it was WH Press
Secretary Jay Carney that made identical statements for two weeks before the story began to
unravel.
Now, the White House wants you to believe the words of Rice, Carney, Clinton and Obama
concerning the Benghazi attack when the drone video showed a much different scenario
where four Americans were killed. Watergate had no casulties and Nixon lost his job,
Benghazi-gate has four Americans dead with a WH and State Dept. cover-up
that continues.
Benghazi questions continues today (10/25/2012) to the Obama White House and when a
request for information as to when Obama knew about the terrorist attack against the U.S.
Embassy in Benghazi, the WH responded that it would not respond to questions about
the embassy attack. How could it be that the "most transparent administration" could possibly
say they "will not respond to those questions"? Obama and political officials need to be
transparent to the American people about all issues.
What did the POTUS do after he heard about the attack on Americans in Libya?
ANS: He blamed the attack on an obscure video and went to Las Vegas.
Can President Obama be trusted?
